Hi Dani, thanks for the post. I do think the wording is slightly confusing here, technically it's 3 people since you paid and you are owed from the other two (3 people in total), but the split is equal between the two splitters. I have been facing this for some time, I'm not sure what I'd like to go with here… it's a relatively simple change, but I can see both explanations being valuable to different people
Dani Asztalos
•
Aug 11, 2025
Bradley Bernard thanks for the reply. I can see your reasoning, but then it is confusing to see two expenses where
I paid for 2 other people
I paid for myself and 2 other people
both show with = 3.
Bradley Bernard
Team•
Nov 19, 2025
Dani Asztalos: Both of those have 3 people, unless I'm not understanding your expenses. The # is the # of people involved, number of distinct users across payers and owers.
Dani Asztalos
•
Nov 19, 2025
Yes, you understand it correctly. It is just confusing to see both expenses say "split equally between 3 people"
Bradley Bernard
Team•
Nov 23, 2025
Dani Asztalos: Yeah realistically it would be split between two people and paid by another person, I could make that change, but will sit on it for a bit, thanks for the feedback!
Log in to comment and vote
Comments5
Bradley Bernard
Aug 3, 2025
Hi Dani, thanks for the post. I do think the wording is slightly confusing here, technically it's 3 people since you paid and you are owed from the other two (3 people in total), but the split is equal between the two splitters. I have been facing this for some time, I'm not sure what I'd like to go with here… it's a relatively simple change, but I can see both explanations being valuable to different people
Dani Asztalos
Aug 11, 2025
Bradley Bernard thanks for the reply. I can see your reasoning, but then it is confusing to see two expenses where
I paid for 2 other people
I paid for myself and 2 other people
both show with = 3.
Bradley Bernard
Nov 19, 2025
Dani Asztalos: Both of those have 3 people, unless I'm not understanding your expenses. The # is the # of people involved, number of distinct users across payers and owers.
Dani Asztalos
Nov 19, 2025
Yes, you understand it correctly. It is just confusing to see both expenses say "split equally between 3 people"
Bradley Bernard
Nov 23, 2025
Dani Asztalos: Yeah realistically it would be split between two people and paid by another person, I could make that change, but will sit on it for a bit, thanks for the feedback!